
I am usually a political shrug-of-the-shoulders type, it's evident in a lot of my blogs. However, I am rapidly metamorphosing into a throw-them-'bows liberal. Its peculiar timing since I have had so many conversations lately discussing how I've learned to love some dear friends who have their feet firmly planted, nay, cemented on the far right. I always figured that one day I would be hailed to "draw the line somewhere" and today, that line has been drawn.
Fact: I would rather NEVER see a woman in the White House than see Sarah Palin anywhere NEAR it (including public tours). Sure, it would be "historic" to have a woman VP, but in this context, isn't the historicity rooted in a technical detail, minutiae? What's the fucking difference if this woman's ideology is simply mantaining the conservative dynasty that has had a chokehold over this country? I would be no more impressed if a pro-life, pro-gun, homophobic centaur was on the ticket. Sarah Palin has minimal foreign policy experience (or 'porn fallacy' as i just freudian slipped), she is a homeschooling creationist (which scares me as a future educator) and she is an advocate of drilling for oil in the Alaskan Wilderness (a temporary solution to a very permanent crisis). I hope that the women voters who supported Hillary solely because she is a woman do not slip so deeply into naivete that they support McCain solely because of his running mate's gender. I'd like to think that the bloc of dispossessed Hillary supporters are a little smarter than that, but at this point, not much would shock me.
So to my friends and colleagues who are trumpeting the historical nomination of Sarah Palin, I ask you this:
If John McCain (who has been able to get the senior citizens discount at IHOP for 17 years now) was incapacitated, would you feel safe knowing that Sarah Palin was in control of the country? I would rather grant executive power to this fine lady.
I think that Sarah Palin should stick to beauty pageants and salmon fishing.
That said, an acquaintance posted something on myspace citing Palin's experience with the fishing industry as evidence of her qualifications. One, the fishing industry is like the oil industry: global commercial fisheries have been overfished and there's no quick fix. I'm curious to know if Palin has a plan for that. Furthermore, the second-largest commercial fishery in the US is in Massachusetts, where the majority of Maine fisherman market their catches. If you want a female Republican from some obscure, cold podunk fishing state as your running mate, I can think of not one, but TWO better choices: Maine's US Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both of whom have decades of experience in Washington.
(photo borrowed from theimproper.)











